The United States Constitution Its Strengths And Flaws Politics Essay

The unify States brass Its Strengths And Flaws Politics seekIn the late 18th century, the linked States organization was designed as a foundation to build a stable governing social structure for the 13 states that composed the United States around that period. These states were relatively different and consisted on predominantly rural and agrarian societies. Moreover, the same account regarded by these states as the unconditional law of the land, serves the exact same intent today as it did back in the day. The 200 year old Constitution of the United States, by far the oldest charter of organisation in the cosmos, faces a time of increasing urbanization and technological developments. Nonetheless, its effectiveness at guiding this rural ara and providing individual granting immunity, economic st major power, economic growth and social development has proven to be substantially enduring over the years.The United States Constitution is oftentimes referred to as a living constitution, because of its adaptability to the uphill and ever changing political and social views, unavoidably and demands of Ameri corporations. Moreover, its enduring nature in a world of continued change has served as a role model for the growing of numerous governmental institutions and their respective constitutions around the world. Its self-correcting and self-regulating nature do possible through amendments, the constitutional supremacy it embraces, the bill of unspoilts, the breakup of superpowers and its comfort of design are major strengths of the constitution.The Constitution is a timeless document due to the adaptability of its nature. It was designed so that it could be amended as the needs of Americans changed over time. However, the founding fathers were well aware that amending the constitution should require operative complexity to avoid the approval and verification of ill-conceived amendments. Moreover, they do undisputable that amending the constit ution was in the best interest of the volume as fence to a select few by putting into effect a dual process that Amendments essential under(a)go in order to be approved and ratified. Furthermore, amendments are subject to judicial review by the lawcourts, a process that originated from the Marbury v. Madison case and allows the courts to review and revoke unconstitutional measures carried step to the fore by a nonher(prenominal)(a) branches of government.The Constitutions supremacy draws the boundaries along which state governments and congress trace and ratify legislation. Despite its supremacy the Constitution is not entirely the despotic authority for it can be amended by the people through their participation in open elections aimed to provide political representation in the various structures of government. Ap shooted and elected officials are subject to be withdraw from subprogram under the constitution if convicted of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and mis de entailors which serves as an intensive to fulfill their constitutional duties, that is with the exception of lifetime appointees of the supreme court and/ or federal judges. The reasoning behind such exception is to rule in the impact external influences often drop on public officials.The governing of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution serves as a mean to nourish the natural rights of the people. It is composed of the first ten amendments added to the constitution which aimed to protect individual freedoms from the government. The first amendment is perhaps one of the most important since it quotationes indulgent issues such as the separation of church and state allowing for freedom of religion. Also, it establishes freedom of speech, press, the right to assembly, right to petition the government, and protects individuals not only from the government tho from each other by restricting libel. Moreover, subsequent amendments address other issues such as the right to bear a rms, search and seizures, prohibition of self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury and counsel, reservation of powers to the state and people powers, among others. In addition, it has a significant influence on laws and policy-making under the teaching for the people and by the people. It is the Bill of Rights along with other factors that distinguishes the United States from other less successful democracies around the world.The separation of powers among the three dominant structures of government is another strength of the Constitution. It allows for the overlap of authority among all government institutions and hinders the closeness of power in one of these institutions. Foremost, the Constitutions simplicity of design outlines the government structures and designated functions. Yet, it does not specify how power is to be distributed among the government institutions, resulting in an ambiguity that has made it possible for the Constitution to successfully guide the United States in the desired direction. Nevertheless both of these have been a source of conflict and gratingly criticized for the broadness of the power allocated to the structures of government.As can be appreciated, the United States Constitution is deeply flawed, to the point where some of its strengths represent major threats to its original purpose put forth by the founding fathers. Although federalism is vital to avoid the engrossment of power in a single structure of government, it blurs the concept of the separation of powers by providing the subject area government with sufficient protection to surpass the power allocated to states. In the time being there is not an easy snuggle to get over with this dilemma tho, it is not terribly hindered to solve as to assign it aside for another 200 hundred years. Therefore, one of the first measures to deal with the problem in question is to narrowly draw the jurisdictional boundaries in order to define the power reserved for each s tructure of government, so that no structure has an unfair advantage over another. Such a measure should address the insufficient protection given to the states as compared to the national government.Another weakness of the United States Constitution is congressional stagnation. The absence of endpoint limits in inter line of products has proven to be an issue of high take aim among politicians. It seems reasonable to argue that term limits in Congress would result in inexperienced individuals taking roles which have been adequately fulfilled by earlier political officers and that the degree to which they represent their constituents as well as their ability to do is questionable. Nevertheless, it is crucial to point out that a large majority of incumbents, that is those currently in office, get reelected INSERT STATS to a point where most Congress representatives have instead established a career in Congress. Their reelection is in general due to the low turnout of electio ns since the public is less involved in these elections as compared to presidential elections, name advertisement and credit obtained from the service provided to their constituents.Because elections take place e precise two years, reelection is the main drive for incumbents, which includes obtaining name realisation among their constituents and service credit within their districts. Incumbents aim to meet the interests and demands represented by the majority of constituents, which has proven to be very problematic due to the emerging concerns regarding whether they act as puppets to secure their seat or act in the faith of making a difference for their constituents by having their voices heard. Either way, incumbents honor unfair advantages over competitors since they are allotted higher campaign bullion than subsequent competitors, for instance through free mail. Additionally, due to the large sums indispensable to fund a successful campaign and the diminished chances of elect ion when speed against incumbents, the number of candidates is inconsequential, limiting the choices of selectrs. Lastly, the long term retention of office by legislators may result in corruption, through the means of lobbyists seeking that legislators address their cause which may not be related or improvement by any means the constituents that such legislator represents.The need to have checks and balances for Congress is evident which constitutes the reason why term limits should be implemented in Congress. The power to establish term limits is delegated to the states and the people and further protected under the 10th amendment. Therefore, a state can propose an amendment by obtaining a two-thirds majority of state legislators to call for a constitutional convention, after which legislators must ratify the amendment with a three-fourths majority. Similarly the field and senate members can propose such amendment, which is very unlikely to occur due to the fact that the ratifi cation of term limits will affect their personal interests.On similar grounds, the electoral College has been harshly criticized since the purpose it served 200 years ago is viewed as rather outdated today. This election arrangement is not only compelling in terms of its design but also the extent to which it is representative of the touristy vote in presidential elections. For instance, in the 2000 election featuring George W. Bush speed against Albert Arnold Gore for the presidency, Al Gore won the popular vote however he did not win the election. Therefore, it is legitimate to question how accurately do outlets of the Electoral College reflect the will of the people. Moreover, because the number of electoral votes allocated to states relies primarily on the number of district and house representatives of the states, it gives larger states the power to influence the outcome of presidential elections. Since larger states are delegated such power, most presidential candidates t ension their campaign and attention on the states with the most electoral votes therefore, smaller states have a disadvantage regarding their political involvement in presidential elections and the honour of their vote as compared to larger states and voter turnout can be further discouraged. The Electoral College can also result in a minority president being electedIt is not terribly delicate to acknowledge that the removal of the Electoral College is by far the best dodge to solve the present situation. Nevertheless, the difficulty lies in designing a system that accurately represents the people. Some politicians argue that providing a representation of the electoral vote proportional to that of the popular vote would ease the problem at stake. However, it is very likely to raise new concerns, especially if both candidates running for office win 50% of the electoral vote, then a method for separate the vote must be addressed, which complicates the nature of the Electoral Colleg e and furthermore defeats the sign purpose of correcting the flawed design of such institution. One way to do this without further complications is by establishing a direct vote system in which all individuals have an equal say in presidential elections and are equally pursued by the candidates running for office.Please discuss the suitableness of the Constitution as a governing document for the contemporary United States. What are the strengths of the Constitution? What are some of its weaknesses? Should we attempt to reform the Constitution? If so, why? If not, why not? You should rely heavily on course somatics, but feel free to use any outside material that will help your argument.Is it public officials or government officials?Are supreme court justices and federal judges public officials too as compared to senators and house members?Paragraph about the separation of powers. Am I making my point clear enough, since its rather a transition into the weaknesses? Purposely chose it..As can be appreciate itIs this contradicting somehow?